How To Jump A Tractor With Positive Ground

The truth of the Milan without bread crumbs ... And one day again

Mayor Lions, known as the National Wheat Capital, criticized the arrest of the Liaison Bureau

"It would good a new National Grain Board "

The proposal aims to benefit small farmers and to demonstrate that the Liaison Officers only defends the interests of large exporters, according to Fabian assesses Francioni, Mayor Lions. Minister Dominguez runs wheat areas.

"The way to solve the problem is that the state buy the 7 million tons for domestic consumption and pay the full price of wheat. However, the conflict is that exporters and Liaison Officers also want to stay with grains for food security " said Fabian Pagina/12 Francioni, the mayor of the town of Leones in Cordoba, known as the National Capital Wheat. He also questioned the crackdown launched by the four agricultural entities and added that in his city "there was little compliance with the measure." However, during the second day of the lockout declared by the Liaison Bureau, the Grain Exchange had no operations, although the ROE Oncca orders registered by exporters (see separate article). Agricultural entities act carried out today in the city of Bahía Blanca.

Agriculture Minister, Julian Dominguez was collected in La Pampa with 200 asparagus growers who months earlier had received non-refundable contributions to plant grain. "I was released around the export quota. This strike is testimonial and political, "said the owner of Agriculture. Mayor
Lions For this new measure of strength of the agricultural entities has nothing to do with the price paid for wheat, but the substantive dispute is "totally open without a quota exports to ensure safety Food. " "The Liaison Bureau all he wants is to stay with the 14 million tonnes to sell abroad," , the official said to this newspaper, but acknowledged that the bid from the products have few potential buyers.
"The problem for small and medium farmers is solved with a new National Grain Board to pay $ 200 a tonne of wheat. The issue is that only the FAA would accompany such an initiative, while the Rural Society and CRA would play against, "said Francioni. While this idea is shared by the Minister of Agriculture, has not yet been reflected in any project.
Dominguez is traveling from the weekend different wheat zones in order to appease the accession of the lockout producers Liaison Bureau. Yesterday was in La Pampa, along Governor Oscar Jorge, and his minister of the area, Abelardo Ferrán. It was a meeting with 200 farmers, which was also attended by Minister of Agriculture of Entre Rios, Robert Schunk, and Agricultural Affairs of the Province of Buenos Aires, Ariel Franetovich, as well as the secretaries of the agricultural portfolio of Santa Fe, Charles Sartor, and Cordova, Hector Font.
"It is true that there are very few buyers and given false information to try to pay less to producers. But recently opened 3 million tonnes for export, a total of seven million, in addition to 1.5 million to buy the mills. With all this, there is no reason not pay the full price, "said Dominguez, who will continue through the different wheat zones throughout the week. "If a farmer needs to sell, call for a cessation of marketing is to harm the most needy," the official insisted.
To control theory called FAS (the international price net of deductions and entry into port), the government will begin today a series of inspections in mills and export companies. At first there will be ten inspectors of the Secretariat of Agriculture and Oncca, who then train more inspectors to extend the controls. "If we find that a mill does not pay the price full, we could no longer used for compensation. The idea of \u200b\u200bthese actions is to have an accurate diagnosis of the problem of producers, "said Oscar Solis Pagina/12.

What Does Jcpenney Salon Charge For Highlights?

Raul ...

Raúl And one day just turned with an air of well-known intellectual and pan in the head, and assured us that we are missing opportunities I do not know what else. And in part it came out something like that differences are constructed on the basis of hatred and meanness, and we kind of weird, because we do not know if you wrote to put in the letter which he copied from somewhere else, or rather that when poured his intellect on it, believed to be in a confessional and painted self-criticism.

But no, I do not think given by the self and the confessional, rather resembles what I said first, a phrase borrowed from somewhere, which is for Raul nothing but a set of words in it: just one sentence. Now that the differences that are built on the basis of hatred and meanness, have nothing to do, to take one example, with the huge profits that have been producing the employers, and the crumbs santiagueños was paid to bringing to their fields to reduce them to servitude . Nor is about hatred and meanness (in addition to large areas) that one must possess to commit terrible crimes against humanity, with hate and meanness empty concepts of the sentence of Raul.

Raul writes. Raul wrote criticizing the hate on hate speech writing. But rather follow the letter is long.

tells us (imaginémoslo with the index finger and a prosecutor in the tic itself) that "Argentines have demonstrated an ability to recover of many things, including appointment overcoming financial crisis, as anti government is repeating the zoncera associates very fashionable back in 2008, that is the field who always saved the country and discredit to this to national government policies that managed recovery.
grout adds in his words, and is sure to see "future generations" will fight against this "head washing" the government does and that results in the conviction that they are ill. It is clear that follows in the stubbornness of seeing the world around him through the eye of a lock. Because it has not yet realized our intellectual Raul head that was washed to believe what the media told us was true and what is not said we did not exist. Head is washed to believe that the agricultural sector was having a bad time, had petered out to just be in the speeches of their leaders. With the cost still does not believe themselves in what they say.
then wants us to believe that the "dávidas" that "divided" government, is generated slavery, ignoring the real slavery that was exposed to eyes of all, discovered in several cities in northern Buenos Aires province, in the XXI century, some (some) farmers have been responsible for generating. It simply fails to guard or already has it absorbed in thought, after years and years of doing the same activity to bring people from the North into submission. In support of this attitude or habit Sampedrina and surrounding payments in zoncera of local woman said that people do not like the chop.
then continues making a knot in the issue of wheat and the explanation they give from the same knot that create, in which we want to imply that if they export more, if left to export more, the price of bread for all "Argentina" will decrease. Adding include delusions, as it is the producers who are enslaved. If the latter were true would with a small problem of language, as that word is less than slavery, that manages to give us a sense that it more offensive. How the hell could be calling people that are being submitted by slaves?
The letter ends by referring to the Mayor of San Pedro, Pablo Guacone, and their participation in the "grotesque fable liar" as he called to meetings by wheat on which he was present. Intending to obtain the unconditional support of the mayor, as he had with Barbieri. As pressure (if pressure can be called that) the Rural Society, with his spokesman at the head, Major Victor, "expect" to avoid confusion and Mr. Mayor did not "associate" with the "predators of freedom and hope" (?) "generators of begging, while they get rich." Building on those who read the letter a little confusion, if enrichment speaking of "them", is specifically targeting them, the agricultural producers, to whom it was just great year just passed, or not. Mug filled with the word freedom, is imposed on the freedom of the mayor, perform, think and reach agreements with those who sing to the three balls.
Clarifies that are not the sector that produces junk, but which are food providers who demand the world, and which, according to their selfish view, no tax should be charged not to "miss this opportunity to sell a lot." A completely ridiculous attitude. We want to say something like "Cobram when selling less." Logic says that, if charged grumble when selling a lot, how the hell will they be able to charge when they sell less? Also given the title of "producer" is totally a liar. How I can I consider myself a producer of something, if every morning I spend on a coffee table, crying "the progress of the government on the sector," while my field, my areas of land, misused my payments, they produce? Should not be called "beneficiaries from nature" instead of producers?
The last paragraphs are made in full by delusions. The majority is due to the heat boluda and the beach. We are stunned with the "fake" good news that we try to "implement the command K", and that therefore we lack a little more "real" bad news. Not enough to TN. And that, says this character is more to the shrink that to another term as president of the Rural Society Sampedrina, "we are not far from a trial for treason in these fabricators of distribution." To know what we mean by Patria Patria, which have the same notion, we must not forget that these "patriots", the country is the earth and not society, not bad people or the forms, but the earth and the earth they have. So when we hear talk of country, do not believe that is more than the small circle where they belong.

Dancing Lady In Red Dress Painting

Much is at stake

Galasso resondió him to Altamira: "Much is at stake."

I answer, but this will be my last post, it is meaningless dialogue of the deaf. I tried to warn you, call to think, respectfully, almost brotherly. I not say that undertakes to act as an agent of the CIA, or that were sold to Magneto and the Rural Society. No. I do not think so, nor I told you. I spoke as a companion to whom one would suggest to proceed sensibly, wisely revolutionary means, taking into account the experiences of Argentina and the world as well as the proposals of the major theorists. Neither do I, "" Stop fooling around against the government because you bring to Macri and Duhalde to power and tease us all, even the Labor Party. Only, I warned, as he advises a friend: "'Che, I quit smoking because smoking is bad and hurts us all. " That, alone. Given this, you answered me angry as if you had no arguments: "meanness", "filth pit", "cheek on," "shameless lie", "provocative", "accessory", "with histrionics collected underworld "," deep political bankruptcy, "resignation", "accommodation", "cooptation", "petty corruption", "political cynicism" and "selling rotten meat." What?

probably tell me to publish it in Popular Signs and you publish yours in Prensa Obrera. But more interesting is that you - tremendous left-riding came with your letter in the "pure blood" of conservative journalism: November 14 last, the doctrine stands Mitre, ie, the daily La Nación, you did a story that starts on top and then occupies the entire page 3, with the title: "The government is afraid of a left opposition" and the caption: "The ultimate reference of the Labor Party talks political responsibility in the killing of Mariano Ferreyra, spurious links between the police and the railway and will of Kirchner's ambiguous to investigate the crime and street gangs debug unionism. " I applaud the oligarchy, Altamira. That old prostitute of journalism uses you see? And I applaud you use. Moreover, the article states that "the Labor Party is growing and even their articles are published in newspapers such as La Prensa, for example." The Press! What Trotsky opinaría of such an event? Unfortunately it has melted to Reader Digest because otherwise issue you could well be another flood of praise.

you remember that article, is not it? Approaches Supplement Nation (14/11/2010) Richard Carpenter story. The journalist will praise, praise you much, Altamira, too: "Altamira seemed intelligent, witty, deep, with a larger discourse distinct from that of many 'professional' on the left Creole. It's funny or not, he and other leaders of the PO parade by many means as a result of the crime of Mariano Ferreyra, but not in official media. You are correct that the Kirchner has intentionally located the PO on the left side of his ring. I was surprised when he spoke of the changes in their group with a certain amount of self-criticism. " This blessing to me produce insomnia, what do you want me to say? And you will correspond well to the morning reactionary, "" If there's a party that handles the nuances of ours ...". He adds: "-The main theme today is show another point: it is true that the country is faced with an alternative Kirchner-right opposition," ie, to demonstrate just what Mitrismo tells middle-class sectors who still believe in independent journalism: do not vote to Kirchner for fear that the right win, no, there are many progressive options. There are only more explicitly endorsed it: the alternative is to continue the horrible kirchnerismo or get back on track of the institutions semi-democracy, as before, in the good old days of 2002 or better, much before 1943.

Elsewhere in the interview, you were wrong, very wrong, when referring to the death of Nestor: "I'm no psychologist, but if a person suffers a stroke and sees a way out, do not have a heart attack. A heart attack is because he sees an exit. " Death not, then, an excess of militancy weakened arteries, but who gets hurt himself on his political impotence. How many kids were assholes to the square to pay homage, right? How many Argentines morons did not realize that there had risked his life for his beliefs, but was nothing more than something like a suicide to not display cowardice inability or ideology? How stupid was shocked Latin America, as the commander Lula or Chavez or Evo and Correa and many other "populist" without your fine psychological capacity to unravel the cause of death of Nestor?

Last, but not only does La Nación and La Prensa understand that the OP is necessary and plays a role that interests them a lot, which is suitable to grow and have more strength to destabilize the government, but also one of your most important men-Branch-part, short time ago in a luncheon with other Mirtha Legrand "leftist" foes of Cristina, Vilma Ripoll and Pino Solanas. You've seen the scene and perhaps revel intimately, but to sit at lunch with this old lady who proclaimed "blonde inside and out, posing for photos with Astiz and scaring spent his public life that "lefties will come" and watch as the cook, with her white apron and cap, announced the menu for gentlemen "and then the waitress, also apron, those meals served rare respectfully own" people bian ", is not it incompatible with the socialist revolution? Did not you find a serious inconsistency?

And there's more, the icing on the cake, "then you go yourself What they said less and you won the admiration of Ernesto Tenenbaum and this I devoted two full pages Twenty (01/02/2011 .) Praise and more praise for who is called "social reporter" and supports practicing "cynicism" and puts you in the clouds, Altamira. To me, I say, I find it outrageous. I'm telling thick repressing words I do not want to lose the line, but if I happen to me or god or allow the devil to the disgrace of this atheist would reflect deeply about the role I'm playing right now in Argentina, as is what I referred in my previous letter.

I repeat it now: you're in a very dangerous game, do not believe that you stand for your wisdom. They do for your perseverance in error. I say it sincerely and do not give me that I envy the recognition of La Nacion, La Prensa and Tenenbaum. "If the sage does not approve, bad / if the pig applauds the worse" as I taught my poor third-grade teacher who believed that Mitre was a Democrat and certainly had never heard of Mariano Fragueiro, or Osvaldo Magnasco .... And Legrand! which is much more dangerous than it appears because although he is ignorant, as noted Luppi, aims and who knows where it serves (And by the way: Federico Luppi Grande!, and also Grande and Florence Esther Goris Peña! and large ! also Chino Navarro, who sang them forty to all these "independent journalists" of the people and dependent on monopolies, such as constipation Grondona and Nelson Castro). What are you doing, Altamira? Each retains its little proud: mine is never having been in the program Grondona, or in the lunches Legrand. For conduct, you know? By political decision. And even try not to watch them on screen, for reasons of mental hygiene.

On another subject, if you did not notice, here is playing the fate of Argentina and throughout Latin America for many years and to me very interested in workers rights rail, but I do not pass the class struggle as the principal contradiction, between the PO and Pedraza. One of your colleagues sent me an email as which "Pedraza is the principal enemy" and you devotes three pages of your answer to apply the same standard, "Galasso not pronounce ... the gang of Pedraza. " No, my old, Twister no!. On October 22, our current Discépolo Policy issued a statement that appeared in November People Signs denouncing the murder of Ferreyra and demanding "severely punish those responsible, without any concessions." Or you read only Prensa Obrera? They also said: "When a national and popular movement, as Peronism, has melted down for a time-like degradation occurred during the Menem administration, as important as recovery, residual elements are always in the minority-unionism, today in continuing the vices of bureaucracy, corruption and hooliganism. " Of course, this does not mean that the class struggle in Argentina is expressed in the antithesis Pedraza-Labor Party, which is theoretical nonsense. I remember what I had Jauretche: a man and combative honestísimo Jorge del Rio, specializing in the issue of electricity, had some difficulty to fully understand the '45 Peronism because Perón, who had nationalized a huge swath business-not the company had expropriated CADE. And brotherly Jauretche told: "'But Argentina's history can not be seen through the keyhole of the CADE. Is much broader and complex. " Also today, however painful the episode that killed Ferreyra, the class struggle also unfolds in a more extensive and complex: the oligarchy fear that Cristina will win in the first round and that applies to fund Media Law and worker participation in company profits and to control internal costs of factory committees and is an America America to the detriment of imperialism, and can not find the candidate with which to deceive the middle to go to second round and join all against Cristina.

The country is split, again, as always, there is the issue, because there are competing projects and one of them favor the conditions for progress and the other popular, no. The other wants to go back. And then I get excited and I talk about what you Evo Morales Evo Negas facing the reactionaries of the "half moon" and the powerful outside interests and your colleagues put a big sign on the door of the Faculty of Philosophy: "García Linera is not persona grata because he is a traitor. " I was amazed as I asked a girl: - What is Evo for you? "A fascist, he said. Poor Trotsky! I said, remembering that Marx: "I planted and harvested lions fleas." And I speak now Correa denounces the negative action in their country, which he calls "left silly" and jump for joy because Fidel is better health. And because the PT continues to lead in Brazil and that Chavez continues to expropriate and talk of socialism in the XXI century. To you all that you say little, inadequate, unworthy of your attention, even you annoying because it makes you more difficult to criticize when they were the neoliberal governments.

And you are here with Pedraza and Kornilov. Not downplaying any of those things that you raise, but I think simply that in the first case, workers are going to renew their union leadership, as has already happened in other guilds because I suppose, now that you say you contemplate the nuances, you will understand that there are different trends in the current CGT, as well as in the CTA. With respect to Kornilov think you fail the calendar: we are in October, Altamira, we're not even in February, and are not the Bolshevik party, neither the government nor is Kerensky Kornilovs now in sight. If we find it hard to understand, to you and to me be frank-the correlation of forces, the level of political consciousness of workers The position of employers of domestic capital, the phenomenon soybean with glyphosate, Monsanto back and multinational exporters, if we are coming off a terrible loss and we are missing pictures from 40 years to 50 years because they have been massacred, I do not come with recipes from a distant country, in a distant time, about which we know very little as to apply to our specific Argentine and Latin American. Moreover, to prevent the Kornilov coup is clear that the Bolsheviks had to match, from their perspective and still holding their noses with Kerensky, who was not the same as Kornilov: "No, it's time. Support the rifle on his shoulder and shoot Kerensky against Kornilov. Then adjust accounts with Kerensky "(L. Trotsky, History of the Russian Revolution, Volume II, p. 165, edit. Sarpe, 1985).

Also the Chinese Communists had temporarily coincide with the bourgeoisie in China, "Chiang Kai-Shek is an oppressor of the Chinese workers and peasants and have no need to remind us. But today is pushed, despite his ill will to make war on the Japanese imperialism, the remains of the independence of China. Tomorrow may betray again. Maybe. More, more, it is inevitable!. But today makes war: the non-participation in this war is something they can only do the comfortable, complete idiots or scoundrels (Leon Trotsky). To do otherwise is to ignore the dialectic and become - do you dream this score? - In "The great organizer of defeats" (L. Trotsky, 1928).

With regard to the "National Left" signs "-Galasso advantage of public ignorance to claim support for the October 17, which is true for the newspaper Labor Front, but where was Abelardo Ramos which, in their October magazine characterized him, however, as an inter-bourgeois struggle ('a struggle for the government within the propertied classes of our country, within which appeared divided the proletariat') "(October No. 1 November 1945). Here incurrís a mischief, because the magazine in October Number 1 was buried in oblivion until the exhumed for nearly three decades in the FIP and the National Left (CEAL, 1983) just to take the correct tradition of Frente Obrero, Ramos assumed then, in 1946. I am glad that you read and pleasantly surprised me, but do not draw the right conclusions. Without denying the merits of Ramos to sustain and disseminate national positions left, broke with the organization in 1971, with some deviations that were worse then to their relationship with the Menem administration, which is why I am in charge of the complaints that bring me on the table. The National Left, initiated Labor Front, is broader than Ramos which -So we talked about earlier, the girl of fifteen ending Fuler wrinkled at ninety-does not mean that we forget their virtues juveniles in this case, especially Revolution and Counterrevolution in Argentina (1957), good times Abelard.

I answer because I am a man of patience, but I do last time because there is no possibility of controversy and recognize yourself you spent all curses.

I answer, somewhat reluctantly, because lowering the level of exchange of ideas, you probably because you have the perfect tactics and strategy, correct without the slightest crack and are not willing to move a line as you come by for decades while the result, according to electoral calculations and the actual impact on workers, there has been very successful to say.

And I repeat, Pensalo. I do not ask self-critical all the mistakes, but you analyze where errors can lead us now as yours and others like you. Think it, I tell you again. Look to the right if you use over and over again, if you keep appearing, you lack Morales Solá, I think, if you keep appearing spoiled by the media oligarchy, although I do not believe in ghosts, you will appear one night the ghost of Leon Trotsky and he'll say, "I broke my brain with pickaxes, what you how they left the brain? "Hail

repeating your slogan: Trial and punishment of all those responsible for Ferreira Mariano! Off street gangs of the railroads and the unions which still exist!. And I add another: By Cristina Kirchner's victory in the first round, opening the way to deepen a process of change for Latin American unification and advancement of the working class!

Source: Paco Agency Urondo

Demonstration Of Waxing

Altamira What breakfast?

This is not to say the "Revolutionary" Altamira, which also to be pimps National Government, not "publish" the answer to his letter Galasso.

You're right about something, we recontraalcahuetes, but we gain in intensity those who walk behind you altamira, as being two or three lunatics, should intensify efforts in pandering.

Following is the transcript of the "Response" to Galasso, where you can see, right from the start, that the leader of PO nice patina of saying that there is a McCarthyite persecution promoted by the Government. Nothing funnier.

UNDER WHAT you fell, Galasso

not surprising that the historian Norberto Galasso join McCarthy's campaign unleashed by the national government and his courtiers to criminalize the Workers' Party and to combat it, as one of his scribes, "to the Penal Code" - the first concrete manifestation of the 'new' policy of "democratic security" to address the social mobilization, which blew in his ear Verbitsky the race of the new Minister of Security. In a 'letter' that was broadcast instantly and profusely, for the most part by the 'blogs' pimps of the ruling (which surely will do the same with this response), Galasso not pronounce two sentences are unavoidable in the mouth of any wrestler "the gang of Pedraza" and "trial and punishment of all offenders." Backwards, "can fall on you," Galasso said, referring to Altamira, "the responsibility for what happens to activists who are victims of fighting as we have seen. " It is, eye, of a threat - of course, from the popular field that does not make the pass but repeats: "I thought, he says, in the kids that you can take risks." Is this man even suspect the level of political bankruptcy and even its vileness? We are in danger, not street gangs of Pedraza, Maturano, West Ocampo, Gerardo Martinez, Guillermo Moreno, the 'horse' Suarez, Capaccioli, Otacehé, police barracks and Avellaneda, the Soldati, the Formosa Spring, but picketing by rail or, for that matter, all picketing of all fighters, and activists like Mariano Ferreyra. No need to purge the political power of these gangs, but trigger a McCarthyite campaign against the PO. Galasso is not even to formulate a theory of two evils - for him and the other courtiers, the devil is one. If we are responsible for the murder of our colleague, the gang of Pedraza is a secondary issue. Galasso

goes further: supports the contention of the lawyers defending the murderers - the "confrontation" - which was refuted without extenuating circumstances, both by the judge of first instance and then by the three judges of Criminal Appeals . Have not you noticed, Galasso, the pit of filth in you down? Galasso thus closes the circle of the criminalization campaign began, the same 20 October, the President of the Nation, when responsibility for the crime to "those who use sticks in the demonstrations" and "students who forced door of the National Council of Education. " After that came the tirades such as "the PO threw a dead national and popular government," the Trots are functional Duhalde "- something that did not remember when Kirchner was taken out to the Presidency politically responsible for the murders of Kosteki and Santillan - which incidentally imposed more than half the cabinet, including most of the current ministers, mayors and pointers. After the killing of Mariano, the Insfrán Kirchner claimed the lives of two peasants Formosa tuffs, and the police chief appointed by the Metropolitan Nestor Kirchner and the two residents of Villa Soldati. Neither the police nor Insfrán are charged, on the contrary, the government supports the reelection of Formosa and ended up signing a pact with Macri to punish by deprivation of social rights of the people fighting for housing. (Shhhh, let che'm reading. Do not misunderstand. Not Che, but I'm just reading, and said Chee) .

If the killing of Mariano Ferreyra was made in order to defend the outsourcing-a super scheme to benefit the big cities - that of the tuff was 'functional' to the interests of landowners and soy producers to Soldati property speculation in the City. Rather than raise the alarm accuser: Where do you Cristina? or preventive warning: Where you're getting carried away?, Galasso points against 'main enemy', that is, according to him, the priority should have any political attack - Altamira and the Labor Party. It has become the 'principal enemy' - To us, not to Pedraza. This is the fallacy that has meaning without the introductory phrase, which claims to have with Altamira "a theoretical point (sic) community: ... create the caring society, egalitarian, where the outbreak and to consolidate the New Man." In fact, we want to apply the Criminal Code. That hoax, right? Galasso

our young militants qualify as kids, not by an act of love but to dismiss that have reached maturity and awareness they have of their own actions. In contrast, the Campora, who honored Insfrán on the eve of the assassination of the Toba, or the Youth Association of sad memory, which celebrated with CFK at River a few hours before the killing of Mariano, are for him a wonderful youth. The 'letter' of Galasso is a provocation in each line and the cheek on a monument. ( I see that this letter also brings a lot of inner peace).

Covering the Pedraza

Galasso not hiding away from the gang who murdered Mariano Ferreyra at any point in your text. Galasso repeats the story that "the right bands" came the sack of the season Constitution, although, for of it, abstains in this case to accuse ourselves for these raids, sure that's unreported what his Minister Nilda Garre and her traveling companion ("occasionally?) Horacio Verbitsky - none of which supported his outrages in court. Instead, he gave Juan Pablo Schiavi, transport secretary and head of the Undersecretary Antonio Luna-man and Pedraza-Maturano, who accused the facts of our activists rail Constitution in court that ordered by the court processing Avellaneda pathways.

Galasso says If you're like, why there are no excesses charged by the Constitution, when La Nacion newspaper published photos of the actors and there are monitors own station? You did not think in this Galasso - at least at night, when "the muscle and ambition lies asleep? But the cover up of what happened in the Constitution, by the clique of 'democratic security', ie the Penal Code and emetics gas, obeys a simple reason: the excesses were armed by the gang of railway bureaucracy, with the intention of reversing the possibility of preventive detention for the seven defendants for the murder of Marian, as was earlier, but that I do not care Galasso, in the strikes of the fraternity to "free the prisoners" and 'assemblies' armed by the UF Temperley with the same slogan. Galasso

mocks, with the same anti-worker style of the press 'destituyente' (now the official copy) of a cut of "20 young rebels" to none, as it does right, the claim of the court: the cessation of layoffs and outsourcing - which claimed tens of thousands on the railroad. Layoffs and outsourcing expressing increased exploitation of capital over labor and the plundering of the workers by the union bureaucracy. But what the hell does it matter that the "left national "! The 250 fellow who cut the tracks left the naked Galasso wonderful government was failing, and still does not comply, the minutes of joining the permanent staff of outsourced. But the government fails signed it because it has a political and economic association with the bureaucracy, that it is a huge factor of power in government Birth & pop. Galasso parrots verse of the entire ruling that 'naturally' in this wonderful government "has left many outstanding bills, lots to do" (password for reelection). If so (admittedly such a thing for a moment), why not gets down to work and check to Pedraza railroad management, the check of the Secretary of Transportation, expelled from UGOFE coimeros capitalists and puts the rail under direct government administration, with control of elected workers' delegates? But the thing that government does, and has said he will do, nor claim Galasso and his cronies of the court's official: support the continuation of the gang in one of the major centers of power and in front of one of the examples greater economic corruption and embezzlement of national funds. Galasso is a simple accessory that disguises itself with the catch phrase of "the principal contradiction." The Pedraza are part of the power Kirchner - in no small measure. Galasso wants a new man but not a better railway pay, working under inhumane conditions. Galasso: Reread your 'letter' and make yourself to mourn. But after all: the 'national left' did not support lifelong union bureaucracy - even in the 70's crime?

The "main enemy"

All this shameless lie, which puts it in the field of abetting the murder of our colleague, Mariano and the enemies of the railway workers , Galasso justified with the argument of "Main enemy" must be supported CFK (and especially his re-election) so they do not succeed the 'main enemy', right. Actually this is a lie, because at no time Galasso CFK characterizes as a class enemy, even 'sub', workers, and does not run under any form, develop a class organization that fights the government - at least as class enemy 'secondary'. After all, the goal of a socialist fighting 'main enemy' is to strengthen the 'enemy side', which side it is a class enemy, but take advantage of the weakening of front of class as a whole implies a defeat of the 'main enemy' to end the domination of class in general. In short, instead of raising any form of class opposition to the capitalist government 'secondary', or to correlate the struggle against class enemies 'main' opposed to any government of the bourgeoisie class, Galasso

is dedicated to threaten our 'kids' with future 'pedrazazos', ie to take advantage of the defensive wall Pedraza as Kirchner government. As in politics with the snipers, Galasso is at the service of all provocations. Indeed, it is a provocation, Galasso complaint and could not denounce the ruling that our fellow rail prosecuted for "extortion" on the occasion of Avellaneda cut routes because the condition makes any claim protest that relies on measures effective direct action. CFK has achieved its initial purpose of criminalizing (penal code) to our party. A judge described as 'blackmail' to a request addressed to an ideal person, not physical, such as the Ministry of Labour, could not have done so without a requirement of political power.

The most 'famous' how to use the thesis of the principal contradiction was offered by the Communist Party in 1976 when called to support the military dictatorship, with the consideration that the 'main enemy' were the Suarez Mason and Menendez, characterized as Pinochet, against Videla. It's the same method applied Galasso: outside concrete analysis of a specific situation, there is always a villain may be attributed the status of 'main enemy' and, by this means, to absolve of guilt the enemy who is next in hierarchy. In the classic example of the Russian Revolution, no one can question that the 'main enemy', for 250 days followed but two Russian Kirchner government was Kerensky. But for two days, when an attempted military coup Kerensky was usurped by a military coup effective monarchical right Kornilov against Kerensky, the Bolsheviks during the two days Kornilov turned into the main enemy, not to support the Kerensky Kirchner. Kornilov's defeat paved the overthrow of Kerensky. The same thing we did with Elizabeth. For two years, fought the Peronist government that created the three A, navarrazo produced in Cordoba, liquidated the Peronist left and attacked the UOM and the city of Villa Constitución - while the rest of the political spectrum arming a block, first 8 and then from 9 to defend the "institutionalization" against a military coup. From July 1975 with the appointment of Videla, produced a shift, and raise the slogan "Down with the hit", while warning that before the coup, now discarded due to the assumption of a 'general democratic '. But while we, Labour Policy, convert the military coup in the 'main enemy', the government of Isabel did the opposite: It targeted as its 'main enemy' to the fighters, and opened even more, in this way, the way for victory of the coup.

The 'National Left' gave full political support to the government of Isabel and therefore the policy of capitulation before the coup. In the case of the Illia government was even worse because Peronism and the 'national left "supported the coup Ongania, either directly or with the call to' unsaddle until it clears." The "national left" and Ramos came to ask for a definition of "national" to the dictatorship ("of the crisis in Argentina to a patriotic front" brochure in October 1978) and later characterized as "military-style patriotic Peron to Seineldin and Rico - This modern military ranks K. The 'national left', which also supported the traitorous Frondizi and only verbally opposed the Liberator, has no authority to give lessons to the Labour Party. Galasso

advantage of public ignorance to claim support from the 'National Left' October 17, which is true for the newspaper Labor Front, but where was Abelardo Ramos, who in his journal in October as characterized, on the contrary, as an inter-bourgeois struggle ("a struggle for the government within the propertied classes of our country ... in which he acted divided the proletariat") (No. 1 magazine in October, November , 1945). Abelardo Ramos alongside Menem ended by chance Menem Galasso also voted in 1989 - always with the argument of the 'main enemy', the UCR Raúl Angeloz, and the immaturity of the class struggle to fight for the development of socialist class opposition. The champions of occupying one of the areas in dispute, refuse to do that when it comes to the struggle against the Ferreyra Mariano Pedraza - and get over the wall talking about a "confrontation." Galasso

knows that, at least 60, the best known popularizer of the subject of contradictions, Mao Zedong. Disseminators of Mao were responsible for disseminating, in turn, the species of the main enemy, whose original version is older, it was the understatement of Stalinism to justify the popular front against 'right'. But in this booklet vulgar, Mao takes his precautions, says for example that in certain cases, the secondary contradiction could become the principal. He knew whereof he spoke: two decades of "long war", the Red Army of Mao had spent 15 years in a civil war against the 'enemy side' - the nationalist Kuomintang ChiangKaisek, the other five against Japanese militarism, but combined with repeated clashes with rivals kirchneristas of China. Seen the final result - the victory of the revolution in China - one must conclude that no civil war against the Kuomintang Birth & pop Chinese masses had ended in defeat. Mao developed this guidance in the worst moment of "class struggle" (as he likes to Galasso), when he had to walk ten thousand miles on foot to escape his pursuers Kirchner, ie representatives of the national bourgeoisie of China .

may CFK government is taking second place in the standings of the 'enemies' of the exploited - with or De Narvaez Macri disputing the first and second with Duhalde. But unlike them is the government, ie the capitalist business manager and in charge of protecting the existing relations of exploitation. This transforms the secondary principal, a worker can not claim the red or Carrio, and only in a limited space to Mauritius. He who does not fight the current government does not fight the power, guide the masses against the parliamentary opposition will not yield anything, so not interested. Only in a crisis of power is a need to distinguish the fields that are disputed the outcome, in this case, only it is necessary to distinguish the enemy, the enemy of our enemy, and heading the batteries from the first - no political support to the latter. The 'national left', by contrast, has joined one of the Bourgeois fields in a strategic way, to the last drop of hemlock - so went with Perón, Bolivians Paz Estenssoro and Siles Suazo, Peruvians Hague la Torre and Alan Garcia, Frondizi, Isabel, to the complete capitulation of the latter to imperialism. Following the metaphor of a girl of 20 years Galasso wants love but at 60 she can run out of teeth, the examples warn that long before the young lady toothless national and popular will become a prostitute.

The Baldwin

Kirchner's government is the trustee in bankruptcy of 2002, came to pay the debts of the dictatorship and Menem. So, to save capitalism, not to transform capitalist social relations that led to bankruptcy. No less sepoy but the government pays usurious debt, that he who contracted it. The K's renegotiated from usurious levels reached in 2000 / 1, including interest. Was the focus of capitalist restructuring of the country, in terms that left him Duhalde, Lavagna. Held with forceps (Subsidies) the privatization scheme and all forms of precarious and black. The Stock Exchange topped out, it expanded the territorial border and financial exploitation of soybean landowner. Galasso welcomes the re-nationalization of the administrators, but without warning we did - that would be used to pay international usury. The AFJP Anses is now a state, it is governed by a PSA system, no sharing, and money is invested in the purchase of debt securities. Kirchner did what any capitalist would have imagined in their dreams under: pay the debt so far as to reduce its share float, 200% to 18% of GDP, by plugging into action Anses, the Pami, the AFIP and the Central Bank.

has executed more people's economic confiscation of all time: the next default takes place, not to foreign creditors, which in any case always rescued, but the retired and the national currency. Thanks to this, now begins a new cycle of indebtedness, which has started in the provinces and the private sector. Invade foreign capital stock and government bonds, this means, politically, this is your government - without tying their hands to anyone who offers to go further. No capitalist wants to depose a government that buys the debt. Add to this the K anti-terrorism law that Congress did vote to Bush's request, which prohibits any organization that effectively show solidarity with the national struggles of other peoples, or the alignment with Zionism against Iran - and we see that Galasso is aligned with the worst interests of imperialism. Ah, the media law, geared to the interests of the octopus of telephony and the official alcahueterismo concealing Pedraza, or the child allowance, sponsored by the World Bank, which consolidated a system of social exclusion by reference the right to work, and pay retirees Anses - until finally some concessions social or legal, without which a government of big business could not govern not for a moment in a democratic electoral system. The current government is the major mining and oil octopus and bankers - the ones who have profited from the exploitation of public debt, finance capital of soybean-exporting of the privatized, and the game. Why the hell a socialist party should not fight?

Galasso seems unwise to characterize the conflict as deductions interburgués soy - do you mean by this that we abstract from what position was best for national development. Well, precisely Our position was: none. A defense of the profit rate of soybean farming on the one hand, opposed the defense of payment of foreign debt on the other. The government's failure in this conflict led him to recapture the funds of the administrators to avoid default and pay the debt. Then did the same with Central Bank reserves, there is a progressive position between agricultural income and financial income.

A Galasso haunts him, however, re-election. "Che, Altamira, want to win the Duhalde-Macri? "Do not get mad if you say it," he adds, with the histrionics collected from the underworld. Is the last bastion of Galasso argument. But if CFK will not be lost for resources exhibiting their 'destituyentes' nor the Labor Party - but because it is 'functional' to Pedraza, bankers, miners octopuses, etc., And economic disruption resulting from played by those interests. But what would be the re-election of Cristina, Galasso? Re-election would shield landowners from Buenos Aires, Scioli, of Gioia, the Insfrán, representatives of big capital automotive and religious education, as Schiaretti or to the 'rentrée' of Reutemann. These rights without recovery, would become the successor of CFK. No has not fallen into a deep political bankruptcy may pose a line like Galasso.

The Labor Party

Galasso's last argument is that "class struggle" (Galasso insists that the more calls for expression of class collaboration) offers no opportunity to the left, have to settle for what you get. The Kirchner did not go further, because the 'class struggle' does not, the fault is not any political force, but the abstract 'class struggle'. But if this is the case, what are offering this 'wonderful youth' who just discovered colleagues Galasso, Open Letter? Resignation, accommodation, cooptation, petty corruption and political cynicism. Galasso had the bad luck of selling spoiled meat from Altamira and the PO when the Bolivian masses were rising against the Kirchner government of Bolivia, which recently adopted the agenda of the right to receive political support. But this uprising, like so many in Europe and Asia, are the expression of the tendency of the exploited against global bankruptcy of capitalism, which is developed in view of everyone, causing an unprecedented social degradation. In these historical conditions, necessarily involve a transition between non-revolutionary and revolutionary situations, our party develops a socialist labor organization, which would be impossible without the unmasking of now I definitely toothless bourgeois nationalism. Why the government has put in place all the resources of the state, including parastatals of the gang, on the one hand, courtiers and scribes, on the other, against our party, the Partido Obrero, why we have become its main enemy, if not precisely because they fear death as political emancipation of the working class?

DOWN THE COVENANT CFK-PEDRAZA, was the gang of the railroads and unions.

Trial and punishment of all those guilty of the murder of our colleague Mariano Ferreyra.